Though both the option have the tax liabilities which we will be discussing for you here:
1. Receiving money from the lender:
Mortgaging the property will not be treated as a transfer but it will be treated as one when it will be disposed of from the borrower or the lender to the legal heir and it is taxed accordingly. If the property is sold by the lender then the capital gain liability shall not fall on the lender but the borrower or the legal heir to the property.
An important thing to note down is that, if the borrower or the legal heir decides not to sell the property but to pay all the dues with the help of other resources then no tax liability is applicable.
According to the Section 10 (43) of income tax act, 1961, any instalment received from bank whether lump sum of the instalment is fully exempted from tax liabilities. Under RMS there are no tax liabilities for the property until it is disposed of.
2. Receiving the annuity from the life insurance company:
In this case, the loan is provided by the lender to the borrower but it is handed over to the life insurance company. The transfer of the money is not treated as the transfer of capital gains. However, the tax liability for the same is different.
According to the tax law, any annuity received is taxable under the head, ‘income from other sources’. In 2013, some amendments were made in RMS to provide for the payment of the lump sum payment due to life insurance companies under the scheme. However, no amendments have been made for the same under Section 10 (43) to make the receipt of annuity exempt from the taxes.
It is clear from the tax laws that the option of receiving the direct payments from the lender is more tax efficient than taking the annuity from the life insurance companies. However, with an annuity, you can receive payment for the life which isn’t the option in the direct payments.